From the blog

Champion vs economic buyer

A champion moves your deal from inside the company and spends their own credibility doing it. An economic buyer gives the last yes and spends money. In cold outbound the useful question is not which one to email first. It is whether the company you are looking at has two of them at all.

By Rahul Bageria, co-founder · Updated August 2026 · 12 min read

Share

The two desks

Champion and economic buyer, side by side

Five things worth knowing about each role, and the last row is the one cold outbound needs. The rest of the committee sits in our buyer personas guide.

What you are comparing	The champion	The economic buyer
What the role is	Argues for you in rooms you are not in, and spends their own standing to do it.	Releases the money without having to ask anyone else first.
Where the word comes from	Innovation research from the 1960s, decades before sales borrowed the word.	Strategic Selling, the 1985 methodology that named the Economic Buying Influence.
What they can approve alone	Usually nothing. Influence is not authority.	Your invoice, up to whatever their own discretion covers.
What they can answer in a cold email	Whether the problem is real this week, in their own words.	Whether it is worth money this year, and against what else.
The tell you can see from outside	They have already spent reputation on the problem in public.	Their function has a team under it, and the money questions get quoted to them.

Sources: Donald Schon, 1963; Howell and Higgins, 1990; Miller and Heiman, Strategic Selling, 1985. The last row is how we read accounts, not a measured finding.

The receipts

The champion is not the person who likes you

Sales borrowed this word and dropped the part that made it mean anything: personal risk. What is left selects for the friendliest reply, and CEB's own research says that is the wrong bet.

Definition

A champion, in the research the word comes from, is whoever pushes something new through an organization at personal risk. Donald Schon named the type in Harvard Business Review in 1963.

Also called an internal advocate · full glossary

The common advice

"Find someone who likes the product, keep them warm, and they will carry you to the person with the budget."

✕Selects for the fastest, friendliest reply
✕Reads access as influence
✕Feels like traction the whole time it fails

What actually works

"The friendly, eager customer advocate is the last person suppliers need on their side." CEB, announcing The Challenger Customer, October 2015.

✓Back the skeptic whose colleagues listen
✓Watch what an opinion costs them internally
✓Ask for one small thing, early

The taxonomy behind that sentence is worth having. Challenger's own account sorts every stakeholder into Mobilizers, who can move a decision, and Talkers, who cannot.

The Friend "always takes your call" and "rarely buys". The Guide "shares information but lacks the influence to drive actual change". Both are Talkers, and both are the contact a founder is most pleased to have found.

The older version

The 1990 research on champions found that formally appointing someone to the role can sap their motivation and put the project at risk. You cannot appoint a champion. You can only find one.

A champion is not the person who likes you. It is the person who will spend their own credibility on you in a room you will never be in.

The evidence

The economic buyer is not the CEO

"The senior decision-maker no longer exists in B2B sales," Brent Adamson said for CEB in 2015. Sales kept borrowing the term as a title anyway, when the question was always who can release the money.

Definition

The economic buying influence is Miller Heiman's name for the one person who can release the money without asking anyone else first. It is a question about authority, not a rank on the org chart.

Also called the economic buyer · full glossary

Four rows, sourced

1

April 2025

Who gives the last yes

G2 asked 1,169 B2B decision makers who makes the final call on software. Department leads and IT together took 46% of those calls. Vendor data, fielded April 2025, global.

2

The C-suite

Stop opening at the top by default

The whole executive floor, the CFO and the rest of the C-suite together, took 36%. A title-driven guess loses more often than it wins, so open with the desk that owns the problem.

3

Under 250

Smaller companies decide lower

At companies under 250 people, G2 found department heads driving the final decision nearly as often as senior leadership. If your list is startups, that seat is your default opener.

4

July 2026

Arm your champion before finance arrives

In G2's 2026 report, nearly half of buyers said their CFO vetoed a deal that was already approved. Finance shows up late, so give your champion the money line early.

36%

The whole C-suite

of final software decisions rested with the CFO and the rest of the C-suite put together.

As of April 2025 1,169 buyers surveyed

Added from two published rows in G2's 2025 Buyer Behavior Report: CFO or finance 20% plus non-CFO C-suite 16%. Department leads 24% plus IT 22% is 46% of final calls.

Read the desks

How to read the desks before anyone replies

Every methodology starts after discovery. This is the part before it: what a company publishes, what each thing proves, and what it does not.

Six public tells

Headcount

Count the function, not the company

One person in the function means one desk and both roles. A leader with a team under them holds the budget inside it. That does not prove they can approve your price, so check the count against your invoice.

Job ads

Their job posts are the org chart

A live ad for the role you sell into states the reporting line and describes the pain in the company's own words. It is the cheapest org chart there is, and it does not prove the role is filled.

Titles

Head of X with nobody under them

At sixty people that title usually means the whole function, so both roles sit on one desk. An X Manager under a VP of X is a champion with a boss. Neither says anything about seniority.

Reviews

Read reviews for the category

Review sites publish each reviewer's role and company size. If everyone reviewing your category at your size is an operations manager rather than a CFO, that is your entry point. It still never proves who signed.

Money talk

Who is quoted about the number

A funding quote about efficiency, a first finance hire, a founder posting about burn. That is the vocabulary the money conversation will run in, and often the person who will hold it. Not a mandate to buy.

In public

Who talks about the problem

A talk, a podcast, a long post about the workflow you replace. Someone who has already spent reputation on the problem in public is the closest thing to a champion you can see from outside.

How we would run it

A worked read: one company, two desks or one

An illustrative walkthrough of the method, not a specific client result. We report real numbers only when they are real.

1

What is public

Four free things

A fifty-five person company. One Head of Support with two agents. A live ad for a support operations hire reporting to the COO. Three reviews of your category by support managers at similar sizes.
2

What each proves

Read them against each other

The function has a leader and a team, so the support budget is hers. The ad puts the COO one rung above her. The reviewers say people at her level buy this category.
3

Where the desks land

Your price decides

At eight thousand euros a year this sits inside her own discretion, so both roles are one desk. At forty thousand the COO becomes a second desk.
4

What gets sent

One email, written to the week

The first email goes to her, about Monday triage, not about support cost as a share of revenue. If the price says two desks, the second contact is written before the first is sent.

Not sure who to open with on your top accounts?

Book a Fit Check

The test

The one-desk test

Headcount does not split these two roles. Your price does. Three steps, and the second one is where most accounts get misread.

1

Ask one question, not four

Never ask whether someone is the decision maker. Ask what would happen next, and count the signatures in the answer.

The question, exactly

If the person who owns this problem decided today, how many other signatures would they need?
2

Count the signatures in the answer

None means one desk: one email, in the language of the person who does the work. One means they own the problem and somebody else owns the money, so open with the problem owner and draft the second contact first.

Two or more

That is a committee, and a different job. The sequence, the angle per seat and the channel per seat are already published in the multithreading play.
3

Price splits the roles, not headcount

A twelve thousand euro tool inside a sixty-person company usually sits inside one department head's discretion. The same company at sixty thousand has two desks. The company did not change, your invoice did.

Operator note

Read before you write

I stopped guessing from titles and started reading the reply. "Let me loop in Priya" is a champion who cannot spend. "Send me something I can forward" is a champion volunteering to spend credibility, which is the only qualification that has ever held.

RB

Rahul Bageria

Co-founder, Real Good GTM

The collapse case

When they are the same person

This is the normal case under about a hundred people, and the one most writing on these two roles skips, because most of it is written for enterprise deals.

What changes in the email

One message now carries both jobs: the problem has to be real this week, and the spend worth it this year. Lead with the week. The year is one line in the second paragraph, never a business case.

The tell you were wrong

A warm reply, two good calls, then silence nobody can explain. That is a second desk you did not see. The fix is not a better email, it is the second contact you never wrote.

Operator note

The founder seat

I have watched founder-to-founder mail work at twenty people and stop working at two hundred. At twenty the founder owns the problem and the budget, so both questions arrive in one message and only one desk has to agree.

KM

Kshitij Maheshwari

Co-founder, Real Good GTM

Two emails

Two roles, two emails, and the difference is not tone

Same account, same week, two units of time. A champion's problem is a week. An economic buyer's problem is a quarter or a line item.

Don't

Send the quarter to the week

Support costs are up sharply at companies your size. Worth fifteen minutes to walk through the ROI?

✕Written for a budget owner, sent to a queue owner
✕Asks for a decision she cannot make
✕No fact only she could confirm

Do

Write the week to the week

Two agents covering a fifty-five person product. Is Monday triage still eating the whole morning?

✓Names the thing she actually owns
✓Answerable in one line, with a fact
✓The buyer's version of this account is the quarter

Illustrative example copy, written for this page. Not a specific client campaign.

One word, two senses

The champion who moved is a different object

This site uses the word in two senses, and mixing them costs a week.

The distinction

Our job change signal means a past advocate who has landed somewhere new, and the relationship travels with them. The deal role does not. At the new company the tests reset, and in week one they hold less internal credit than almost anyone.

The repeatable motion off that move, touch by touch, is the champion tracking play.

Key takeaways

4 points

1 A champion is defined by what it costs them, not by warmth.
2 An economic buyer is whoever can release money without asking.
3 Count signatures, not headcount, and count them from outside.
4 Your price decides whether one company is one desk or two.

Failure modes

Five ways the read goes wrong

Every one is a failure of reading the company, not of writing the email. The last one quietly costs a quarter.

A senior title is not a signature

You have a name, not an approval. On G2's 2025 split the whole C-suite is about a third of final decisions, so a title-driven guess is wrong more often than right.

One desk read as two

You send the executive email to the person who does the work. It reads as a template to the only person who could have answered with a fact.

Two desks read as one

One email, one reply, no second contact. The thread stays warm right up to the money question, then stops somewhere you cannot reach.

Skipping the champion to save a step

You decide the problem owner cannot sign and write to the title above them. You get routed back down to the person you skipped, introduction now second-hand.

!

Caution

A coach is not a champion

A coach gives you information; a champion takes a position. Miller Heiman's own red flags name low influence on a coach. Backing a Friend feels like traction for a whole quarter, and at seed that quarter is unrecoverable.

Do this instead

Ask for one small thing that costs them: a forward, an introduction, one internal meeting.

FAQ

Questions founders ask

What is the difference between a champion and an economic buyer?

A champion moves the deal from inside and spends their own credibility doing it. An economic buyer gives the last yes and spends money. Influence against approval. At smaller companies they are often one person, so the first question is how many signatures a decision needs.

How do you tell which is which before anyone replies?

Count the function on LinkedIn, read the reporting line stated in the company's own job ads, and check whether the title has a team under it. Those three cost nothing and settle most accounts. Then check the read against your price, which decides whether the roles sit on one desk.

Is the economic buyer always the CEO?

No. In G2's April 2025 survey of 1,169 B2B decision makers, the CFO or finance leader took 20% of final software decisions and the rest of the C-suite 16%, so the whole executive floor is 36%. Department leads and IT together were 46%. At companies under 250 people, G2 found department heads deciding nearly as often as senior leadership.

What is the difference between a coach and a champion?

A coach gives you information. A champion takes a position and spends something to do it. Miller Heiman's own methodology lists low influence on a coach as a red flag. The test is not how warmly someone talks to you, it is whether they will do something that costs them.

Who should you cold email first?

The person who owns the problem, because they are the only one who can answer with a fact rather than a policy. If the account genuinely needs several signatures, that is multithreading, and the sequence for it sits on our play page rather than here.

Can the same person be both?

Often, at companies under about a hundred people, and almost always when your annual price sits inside one department head's discretion. When the roles collapse, one email carries both jobs: the problem has to be real this week and the spend worth it this year. Lead with the week.

About the author

Rahul Bageria

Co-founder of Real Good GTM. He has been the first business hire and Chief of Staff at seed-stage B2B startups, building outbound pipeline before any playbook existed. This post is the read he runs on an account before writing a word: who owns the problem, who can release the money, and whether that is one person or two.

Connect on LinkedIn

Keep going